|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DID
HINKLE PROVE LADDERED CONSTRUCTS ARE SUPERORDINATE?
A RE-EXAMINATION OF HIS
DATA SUGGESTS NOT |
|
|
Richard C. Bell |
|
|
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Laddering is
an construct elicitation technique that purports to obtain superordinate
constructs. Hinkle, who invented the laddering technique, used an implication
grid procedure to test whether the constructs elicited by laddering were
superordinate to those used to initiate the laddering procedure. He concluded
that laddering did indeed produce superordinate constructs. However the analysis on which this conclusion
was based was at the broadest level, including all implicative relationships. No
other studies have addressed this issue in this fashion. A re-examination of
Hinkle’s data focussing on just those implicative relationships between the initiating
(subordinate) and the laddered (superordinate) constructs showed each was as
likely to imply the other as the reverse. It is concluded that Hinkle’s data
did not provide support for the superordinacy of laddered constructs and an
appropriate model to describe the relationship between initiating and laddered
constructs remains to be developed.
Keywords:Laddering,
superordinate-subordinate relationships, implication grids
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCE
Bell, R. C. (2014). Did Hinkle prove laddered
constructs are superordinate? A re-examination of his data suggests not.
Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 11, 1-4, 2014
(Retrieved from http://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp14/bell14.html)
|
|
|
|
|
|