|
Creativity
cycle |
|
"The Creativity Cycle
is one which starts with loosened construction and terminates with
tightened
and validated construction." (Kelly,
1955/1991, Vol.
2, p. 7/1991)
As one would expect in a theory
to do with
human experiencing and each of us being "a form of motion", Kelly
describes
three cycles to do with the
process of construing. These three cycles describe experiencing, decision making and creativity. The Experience Cycle consists of five phases: anticipation, investment, encounter, confirmation or disconfirmation,
and constructive revision.
Certainly in personal construct
theory's line of reasoning, experience is not composed of encounters
alone.
The CPC
Cycle (sometimes called the "decision making cycle") consists of
first circumspection - one
looks as possibilities, then comes preemption
when we decide that the grand piano either will or will not go through
that
door, followed by control when
we leap into action and try the door for
size. As with the Experience Cycle, the person is actively involved in
the CPC
chain of events.
We are
here focusing on the Creativity Cycle
which is concerned, as its name
suggests, with creative activity. It describes a process of construing
that
moves from loose construing to tight construing and back and
forth until a person feels something has been "created" that can be
test out. Unlike the Experience and CPC Cycles, there is no personal
commitment
involved here.
"Loosened
construction ..sets the stage
for creative thinking…The loosening releases facts, long taken as
self-evident,
from their conceptual moorings. Once so freed, they may be seen in new
aspects
hitherto unsuspected, and the creative cycle may get underway." (Kelly, 1955/1991; p. 1031/Vol 2
p. 330 )
The
primary example of loose construing is in dreaming. Ideas appear to drift
around, they are not anchored in reality. We can experience this
process when
awake, for instance when day-dreaming. Ideas come together that have
never been
seen in that way before. That process can go on as long as one wants.
But
suddenly two ideas collide that make us sit up and, thereby, tighten
our
construing. "What an interesting idea!" "I wonder if that would
work?" We may experience several of those occasions before we are
convinced that this new idea really would work. We then have to go and
test it
out. After all, our behaviour is the experiment that always tests out
our
construing. The Creativity Cycle can be experienced in any context.
Students go
through many such cycles as they are introduced to totally new ideas
and
managers sometimes find it useful to work together on re-thinking the
way they
work. Being exposed to new ideas need not cause problems because, as
the Fragmentation
Corollary says, we do not have to give up an old idea before
entertaining a
new one.
Some
people may have a problem in being "locked in" to one mode or the
other. In that case, neither cannot be creative. The person using
mostly tight
constructions produces a lot of things but nothing that has not already
been
created. A person who uses only loose constructions never gets out of
the stage
of mumbling to himself. He cannot get around to testing out that
construction. The
creative person must have the ability to move from loosened to tightened
construing. Those who prefer to construe the world from a generally
tight position
may well find loose construing anxiety-making.
For with loose construing we
lose control of things, we do not know where such construing might
lead. Those
locked in to loose construing find it very difficult to come to any
firm
conclusions. The counselling and psychotherapy process is a series of
Creativity Cycles as the client explores new ways of dealing with life.
Without
creativity our lives would be one monotonous continuum of well-worked
out
events.
|
|
References |
|
- Leitner,
L. M. & Faidley, A. J. (1999). Creativity in experiential personal
construct psychotherapy Journal of
Constructivist Psychology, 12¸ 273-286
- Bohart,
A. C. (1999). Intuition and creativity in psychotherapy. Journal
of Constructivist Psychology, 12¸
287-312
|
|
Fay Fransella |
|
|