|
Personality |
Unlike the majority of
personality definitions, where personality is
most often defined as distinctive individual character or that inherent
quality
of human beings which makes them individual, personality in PCP is
closer to
the eyes of the beholder. Personality is an abstraction from the
activity of a
person, with subsequent generalization of this abstraction to all
manner of
relationships of that person to other persons.
Four
points about personality
are of crucial importance:
(1) |
it is not an inherent object that should be
discovered, but an
assessment based on abstraction of known activity of an individual
person, so
it can be generalized to the unknown activity of that person; |
(2)
|
it is based
on a person’s relationship to other persons and not on some inner
substance; |
(3)
|
it is not neutral, but a value-laden term; and |
(4)
|
it is a course of events
– a process, not a static entity.
|
The
person in PCP is perceived as the intersect of many construct dimensions. This means that a
person is a unique combination of dichotomous
categorical interpretations. Although it is often said that PCP equates
personality with personal construct
systems, persons in PCP are above all social
beings, construed in the realm of social relations. Society therefore
presents
the necessary condition for the constitution of personal beings, their
persons
and personalities. Furthermore, social situations and social
relationships are
not determined by some inner essence of individual beings that occurs
within
them. Instead, people are determined and formed by their interpersonal
relations. Thus personality in PCP does not reside in the human
personal
interior, but in the social space with other personal beings. One has
to enter
these social relations in order to become a person him or herself.
Furthermore,
personality is not given at birth; instead it is potential
which has to be constructed through mutual relationship
with others. Simply stated, we need others to acquire our own
personality.
Talking about others, we reveal our own abstractions, dimensions of
meaning
which comprise our own personal systems. In order to assess the
personality of
an individual, we must assess the ways (s)he makes sense about others.
Therefore, what one says about another person becomes the source of
data about
the speaker, more than the person who is being spoken about.
|
References
|
|
Dušan Stojnov
|
|