|
|
|
|
|
OBITUARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
MICHAEL MAHONEY (1946-2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Mahoney, age 60, of Portsmouth, Rhode Island, USA, died
in his home on May 31, 2006.
Michael was born
on Feb.
22, 1946 in Streator, Illinois, USA.
Michael was my friend and colleague from
the time I met him in 1991, shortly before I was hired as a beginning
professor
in his department at the University of North Texas. When I say that Michael was my friend, I know the
enormity of the
company in which that places me. Only a brief survey of his on-line
obituary
and message-page reveals the scores of people from literally all over
the
planet who knew Michael as an extraordinary person, and an
extraordinary
friend.
Michael’s professional vita was as
extensive as any could be, and peppered with contributions that
affected the
course of psychological thought and psychotherapeutic practice on par
with the
most influential writers of the latter half of the twentieth century.
He began
his prolific scholarly productivity with the publication of "The
application of reinforcement
and participant modeling procedures in the treatment of snake-phobic
behavior"
in Behaviour Research and Therapy (1969,
Volume 7, pp. 369-376, in
collaboration with David Rimm) while Michael was still a student. Even
in this
earliest of his publications, one could see a tableau of what was
quickly to
come: Michael’s turn to the importance of internal processes as
important to
therapeutic change. Thus, by the early 1970’s, Michael was writing
about "covert" and self-regulatory processes...writings that would
become important
foundational pillars in what was later called the "cognitive
revolution" in
psychology. As the revolutionary became the ordinary (by virtue of its
success), Michael never lost his taste for pressing against the edges
of the comfort
zone of mainstream psychology. As early as 1976, with the publication
of his oft-cited
book entitled, "Scientist as
Subject: The Psychological Imperative," Michael
began pointing therapists and researchers toward the complex wisdom and
self-organizing capacities of human beings, regardless of which side of
the
couch (or laboratory apparatus) they might be occupying. So, while many
of the
other pioneers of the cognitive age within psychology were busy
enthroning
their theories (and themselves?) with the trappings of orthodoxy,
Michael was
forging ahead into constructivism, autopoesis, and other postmodern
conceptions
of human beings, how they live, and how they change. By way of this
pioneering
spirit and voracious incorporation of theoretical and philosophical
work far
afield from what most psychologists read, Michael played a central role
in
bringing constructivist thought to the breadth of the field of
psychology by
the end of the twentieth century, in no small measure due to his book, "Human
Change Processes" published in 1991. For the last 15 years of
his life, he
continued developing and extending these boundaries of psychological
thought, publishing
another half-dozen books, two dozen book chapters, and nearly three
dozen
journal articles. Michael’s body of scholarly contributions shows a
rare
combination of prolific quantity, ingenious depth, and far-flung
influence.
As extensive and influential as his
professional writings have been, I would argue that they were the mere
entree
into the hearts of persons not yet introduced personally to
Michael-the-man. Having
known how Michael impacted me, and having seen his impact on dozens of
graduate
students and professional colleagues we have known in common, over the
years I
have often pondered over exactly how he was able to have such a
profound effect
on people, often with seemingly little quantity of contact. Certainly,
with his
passing and with the sharing of grief amongst those of us who knew him,
I have
pondered this all the more deeply. I find myself little closer now to
the
knowledge of "ow he did it" than ever. But I have abstracted a single
observation that I rely upon to anchor my own memories of Michael:
Michael
believed that humanity is interconnected with all of humanity and with
all of
nature, and he made it his life’s quest to acknowledge and magnify that
connection. This made emotional communication Michael’s primary
language. This
incredible talent may have become Michael’s most dangerous
vulnerability...he
experienced and expressed his emotions at a level most human beings
simply
never access. Those of us who experienced those connections with and
expressions from Michael over the years remain in awe of their depth,
their
sincerity, and their life-changing meanings.
Michael’s accomplishments and choices
are
now part of our collective human and cosmic history. As with all
mourning, the
crucial choices yet to be made lie with the mourners. How will we
remember
Michael J. Mahoney? The funniest "joke" Michael ever told me addressed
this
very point. Michael, embracing his Irish heritage, could perform a mean
Irish
brogue; so his affinity for this story likely rested with its ample
opportunity
to employ the Irish accent. The story begins with an American in a pub
in rural
Ireland. Noticing that many of the locals seemed to be addressed
by
nicknames rather than proper names, he approached a grizzled Irishman
downing a
warm ale and asked, "What do they
call you, Mister?" The old man explained and
complained (all with Michael’s Irish brogue) how he had done many
things in his
life, such as building barns, constructing stone fences, brewing
quality ales,
and the like...all of which would have made for good monikers. "But do you
think they call me ‘O’Malley the Barn-Builder’ or ‘O’Malley the
Fence-Builder’
or ‘O’Malley the Ale-Brewer’? NO!!! They don’t call me any of those
things. But...a
fellow makes love to just ONE GOAT..."
Michael’s
life was lived with much vigor,
power, and emotional generosity. He chose to give us those things as
gifts. He
also made choices in the ending of his life that we may never
comprehend. But
how we will remember Michael remains our choice...our responsibility. I
will
remember the sense of humor (and yes, the exaggerated Irish inflections
during
his "just ONE GOAT..." story). I will remember his ability to connect
with and
validate the existence of the many wanderers and seekers who came his
way
(myself included). I will remember the mighty (though diminutive) man
who
lifted weights above his head as if to dare gravity to fight him. I
will
remember my friend. What will you remember?
Kenneth W. Sewell, Dept. of
Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCE
Sewell, K. W.
(2006). Michael Mahoney (1946-2006). Personal Construct Theory &
Practice, 3, 14-15.
(Retrieved from http://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp06/sewell-mahoney06.html)
Contact: sewellk@unt.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDITORS' NOTE
Readers may be interested in Michael Mahoney's
Autobiographical Reflections published in 2000:
Behaviorism,
cognitivism, and constructivism: Reflections on persons and patterns in
my intellectual development. In M. R. Goldfried (Ed.) (2000). How therapists change: personal and
professional reflections (183-200). Washington, D.C.: American
Psychological Association.
Also at: http://www.constructivist.net/mahoney/Autobiography%202001.htm
|
|
|
Photo: Jörn
Scheer |
|
|
Received: 3 August 2006 - Accepted: 5 August 2006 -
Published: 6 August 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|