|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROMOTING WORLD WIDE
WISDOM:
PERSONAL CONSTRUCT PSYCHOLOGY AND THE INTERNET |
|
|
Jörn W. Scheer
|
|
|
Department
of Medical Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
Among the
many groundbreaking inventions that happened during my lifetime, two
have been
of special importance to me: the Psychology
of Personal Constructs (PCP) and
the World Wide Web. How they connect,
is the subject of this paper.
MY INTRODUCTION TO
PCP
As for my
becoming acquainted with PCP, I was lucky. In the early 80s, one of the
research assistants in our department had developed an interest in PCP
for
whatever reason. He played around with grids, e. g. eliciting mutual
assessments of marital partners. I watched what he was doing, talked to
him a
lot, found the method intriguing and became increasingly interested in
the
theory underlying it. The next step was that I had a doctoral student
look into
doctor-patient relationships between women and their gynaecologists,
using
repertory grids. She produced interesting findings concerning the role
of the
doctor among the relevant others of the women she interviewed, and
after a
while I got hooked.
PCP was
even less known in Germany then than in some other European
countries. Inquiring Man (Bannister
and Fransella, 1977) had been translated into German in 1981 but had
appeared
in a publishing house outside psychology which focuses mainly on
theology,
history and philosophy. In 1986, the first three chapters of Kelly
(1955),
following the 1963 English paperback edition, were published in German
in a
small and even more marginal house. Although Kelly was mentioned in
some
psychology textbooks, that did not have an impact on the reception of
PCP in
academic psychology which remained insular at best. I then learned
about a few
local groups interested in Kelly, and joined what called itself the GGG
or
German Grid Gang, the nucleus of the German PCP group – a dozen or two
people
who met three times in a year, none of them in an influential or at
least
secure academic position.
So I am one
of those who discovered PCP relatively late in their professional life.
I was
over forty and had been a professor for a couple of years. That means I
did not
have to cope with ignorant supervisors, a hostile faculty, or lack of
access to
university resources.
But was I
really lucky? Maybe my professional career would have taken a different
direction
had I discovered Kelly earlier! When I began studying psychology, in
1962,
modern empirical psychology was just about set to take over the
academic chairs
in West Germany. Until then, psychology in Germany had more or less
recovered
from the drought in the Nazi era by recurring to the psychology
dominant in the
1920s. This did not include psychoanalysis which was taught and
practiced
outside the university system. When academic psychology embraced the
empirical
approach favoured in Britain and the United States, we used North
American textbooks
because the German ones hadn’t adopted the modern ways yet. We read
Anastasi’s Differential Psychology – the 3rd
edition of 1958 didn’t mention Kelly or PCP. Nor did Hall &
Lindzey’s Theories of Personality – the 1957
edition, or Guilford’s Personality
(1959), or Kretch & Crutchfield’s Elements
of Psychology of 1958. In our fundamental text on social
psychology, by Kretch,
Crutchfield and Ballachey, The Individual
in Society, published in 1962, I later discovered a box describing
an
experiment by Bieri and Blacker on ‘cognitive
multiplexity’ where they had used Kelly’s ‘Repertory Test’. I hadn’t
noticed it
then, and Personal Construct Theory wasn’t mentioned anyway. So I
became an ‘empirical
psychologist’. Nothing I regret, really – but it did
delay my exposure to PCP for twenty years.
USING PCP IN
RESEARCH
So I
discovered PCP after I had been working for a couple of years in a
Department
of Medical Psychology linked to a Department of Psychosomatic Medicine
in a
Medical School: at the University of Giessen in Germany. My research
focussed
mainly on psychological processes in psychotherapy, in medical practice
in
general and in health psychology. Therefore I was able to use concepts
based in
PCP as well as the Repertory Grid Technique in a variety of research
fields,
including patients suffering from anorexia, colitis, psoriasis and
hepatitis. Another
area was the doctor-patient relationship in gynaecology, couples
relationships
and parenting, including constructions of the unborn child. We studied
health
behaviour in connection with smoking, and I was able to extend my field
of
research to ageing and attitudes towards death and dying. This lead to
studies
conducted together with Julie Ellis in Australia on ageing and on the professional
identity of nurses.
PCP AND ME
In the
beginning, I was interested mainly in repertory grids – like so many
other PCP
colleagues new to the theory. Socialised in the tradition of hard-core
empirical research, I had become increasingly frustrated with the often
surprisingly unsophisticated psychological background of this kind of
research.
Streamlining the research design to the operational definition of
isolated variables
and assessing, even ‘measuring’ them, seemed to me to be too easy a way
out of
the epistemological dilemma that one faces when the human psyche tries
to perform
research on the human psyche in a ‘scientific’ way. The prevailing
philosophy behind
this kind of approach has rightly been termed ‘naïve realism’ or
‘naïve
empiricism’, and I found this attitude unacceptable, at least for me.
Professionally,
I had been brought up in a kind of Freudian working environment (in one
of the
few university hospitals with a, somewhat non-orthodox, psychoanalytic
orientation),
while philosophically influenced by an earlier exposure to
existentialist and
Marxist thinking. However, increasingly the often equally naïve
self-righteousness of some of the psychoanalysts I knew appalled me.
They seemed
convinced that they were in the possession of the definitive truth,
unconcerned
with any need for empirical evidence beyond their case-based clinical
experience
– of course, at least in part, this may be attributable to their
embattled position
between mainstream empirical psychology and purportedly scientific
medicine.
In contrast, I found the
modesty and the
theoretical openness of the PCP scholars I met attractive. And I liked
their
view of mankind (or ‘humankind’) – their Menschenbild,
as we say in German. To me, the famous metaphor of ‘man-as-scientist’
(ignoring
the proto-sexist wording) included both humans as shapers
and as being shaped
(by environment, upbringing etc.), with attaching
meaning, or meaning-making as the decisive link.
Consequently, when I began
meeting ‘PCP people’ first on a
national scale
and then internationally, I started making friends on a level quite
unusual for
an academic or scientific community. I often wondered why the
atmosphere at PCP
conferences and congresses is so different from that at many other
conferences
I had attended. The latter are often extremely competitive, presenters
seem to
be rivals rather than colleagues, showing off and being seen and
noticed are
obviously the prime goals, and the younger and shyer newcomers are
dealt with
accordingly. I’d like to think that the much more co-operative spirit
and the encouraging
behaviour at PCP conferences is due to the general spirit of
constructive
alternativism and the acceptance of others and of others’ possibly
differing
opinions. But it may also have to do with the simple fact that going to
(and
shining at) PCP conferences does not necessarily increase one’s
academic
prestige or advance one’s career, so that only people who are really
interested
in the matter (and in the people) go to these conferences.
So what I received from my
acquaintance with
the PCP community was (and is) a psychological approach to the ‘human
condition’
that I could (and can) embrace whole-heartedly, because I can agree
with its
basic tenets and welcome its implications.
GIVING BACK
Any human
society or even community doesn’t work without a culture of giving and
taking.
What did I give back for what I took? It may help to refer to the
phonetics of
my personal name. As my name is not easy to pronounce for non-native
speakers,
at conferences I used to ask people to imagine the English words ‘to
yearn’ and
‘to share’. That’s what I do: I yearn to
share. In that respect I am probably not different from the odd
missionary
or envoy who is determined to spread ‘The Word’ to the uninformed or
unenlightened.
Well, there
is something to it. Firstly, I am convinced that the Theory of Personal
Constructs
deserves wider recognition, and that its concepts and tools could be of
eminent
use for many professionals who have never heard of it. And that is the
second,
most important point. If you look at the number of copies printed of
PCP books,
and the number of subscribers to PCP journals, than it becomes obvious
that,
quite simply, most people who could be interested never had the
slightest
chance of even hearing (or reading) about PCP. Most academic libraries
do not
stock PCP books, the tiny bit about PCP that is handed over by academic
teachers amounts mostly to not much more than “Then there was Kelly,
1955, an
early version of a cognitive personality theory, and the repertory
grid, a
cumbersome procedure that doesn’t match the criteria required of
diagnostic
tools”. Sure, Kelly has been praised
by some of his contemporaries, PCP is
mentioned in some textbooks, there are
people who have become infatuated with PCP. But by and large, PCP is
virtually
and widely unknown. Interestingly, when I talk to an educated lay
person about
what I’m doing professionally and speak about PCP, as my special field
of
interest in psychology, then a frequent reaction is: “But isn’t that
what
psychology is about?” Well, it is, and it is not. If you look at the
mainstream, these days the discipline seems to be more interested in
the
biological prerequisites or correlates of psychological processes than
in the
processes themselves.
Now, modern
information technology has provided means to change this state of
affairs. Of
course, I mean the World Wide Web
which enables the interested surfer to gain access to otherwise unknown
shores.
Being versed in using the Internet not only as the treasure trove that
it also
is, but as a means to distribute information, I set out to establish a
number
of web sites designed to spread information on PCP. I was inspired by
the
pioneering work of Mildred Shaw and Brian Gaines with their web site at
the Centre for Person-Computer Studies in Calgary
and the Internet discussion group initiated by David Nightingale (the PCP mailing list), and set up a ‘portal’
with information on PCP (including a newsletter) through which everyone
in the
world with internet access (and with some command of English) can find
a way
into the community. As you may know, I am an avid conference goer (and
conference organiser) because I love to meet like-minded people and
friends,
and hence I know many scholars and practitioners of PCP personally.
This proved
an enormous asset when I had the idea to initiate an Internet
Encyclopaedia of PCP. I am old-fashioned enough to appreciate
and even love books, and I think that Fay Fransella’s International
Handbook of PCP (to which I had the honour of
contributing a little piece) is the definitive source on PCP fifty
years after ‘The
Book’ and probably for the fifty years to come. But I also believe that
it
needs to be supplemented and supported by an online medium. I am glad
and proud
that so many colleagues, including Fay Fransella, are working on that
project
(which I co-edit with Beverly Walker). The same considerations hold for
periodicals. These days, few individuals can afford to subscribe to a
printed academic
journal, many libraries reduce their stock, the numbers of copies
printed are
minimal, and again the Internet seems to be the solution. Therefore,
together
with Trevor Butt, I have established a free online journal, Personal
Construct Theory & Practice,
which is now the only journal devoted to PCP as other journals, in part
for
want of subscribers, have widened their scope to a accommodate a
general ‘constructivist’
community.
REACHING OUT
As a
retiree, I no longer work in a professional environment: no more
research
students, no more funding, no more access to ordinary academic
resources.
Consequently, my interests have moved away from ‘professional
applications’ of
PCP. To me, the ‘spirit of PCP’ encompasses not only constructive
alternativism, but also what I have called ‘constructive
internationalism’ (Scheer,
1996) - in spite of the apparent Anglo-centrism of PCP which is
probably due to
its heavy reliance on language-based communication. My own experience
with PCP
colleagues all over the world makes me feel comfortable with this
spirit of
internationalism, and I have tried to express this in a book I edited
(yes – a
real book!) on Crossing Borders – Going
Places. Personal Constructions of Otherness. And, indulging in a
personal
soft spot (or rather a passion), I have invited a number of PCP
colleagues to
contribute to a book on Creative
Construing. Personal Constructions in the Arts that I co-edited
with Kenneth
Sewell this year. Incidentally, Fay Fransella wrote a chapter on ‘Kelly
and
poetry’ for this book. And I am enjoying tremendously the flourishing Arts-and-PCP Network that resulted from
this co-operation.
Somewhere
Kelly has mentioned that PCP itself may have a use-by date (those were
of course
not his words) and a limited range of convenience. The range of
application of
the theory however has been expanded dramatically during the last fifty
years,
far beyond psychotherapy. First education and organisations, then many
other
fields have profited from the induction of PCP ideas. Comparable
probably only
to psychoanalysis, PCP has developed into a kind of generic psychology
that
reaches out into a multitude of professional fields. Which seems
paradoxical,
given its limited visibility so far.
But do we
have to stop here? I don’t think so. In a paper presented at the
International
Congress on PCP in Huddersfield three years ago, I pleaded for an extension
under the heading ‘PCP and
the small things’. Personally, I found PCP concepts, the very idea of
us construing
permanently, the concept of anticipation, of ‘living in time’, the
notion of
validation and invalidation etc. often helpful in everyday situations,
far from
scientific reflection – including experiences such as ‘going to the loo
on a
plane’ (the title of my presentation). I have a vision that one day PCP
might
inform us (and others) in a way that makes life more reasonable and
living more
enjoyable.
WORLD WIDE WISDOM
Well,
visions are visions, and as a former German chancellor, Helmut Schmidt,
used to
say, “If you have visions you should see a specialist”. If we look at
the PCP
community as it is, it is still a small congregation. The Journal
of Constructivist Psychology (JCP, formerly the International
Journal of PCP) has a paid
circulation of under 200, the Mailing List has about 300 members, the
free
online journal Personal Construct Theory
& Practice has a bit less than 500 subscribers. If we
arbitrarily
double that figure, we arrive at about one thousand. Not many! But
possibly
influential: There must be an unknown number of students, disciples,
readers,
followers who don’t appear anywhere in public. Some entries in the Internet Encyclopaedia of PCP have 300 ‘hits’
per month. It seems there is a potential.
On the
other hand: International PCP conferences are attended by not many more
than a
hundred delegates, wherein free availability of information on the
Internet and
reduced travel funding may have an impact. But do we want bigger
conferences?
Occasionally I hear voices indicating a preference for the comfort zone
of
small-scale meetings. But I think it is not only about us oldies
feeling
comfortable. We need to attract younger people, and from the evidence
of the
last couple of conferences I attended I think they are around. Would
they
prefer a more general ‘constructivist’ stance (as some of our seasoned
professionals seem to do)? I don’t think so. If they are interested,
they are
attracted specifically by the theory and techniques provided by PCP
because
they want to become practitioners or researchers, not necessarily
philosophers.
They know how to use the Internet and
they want to meet the ‘elders’. So we need both: cosy conferences and World Wide Wisdom.
I think the community needs to
grow also
because I believe, in all modesty, that society as a whole would
benefit from
its impact. Let’s develop constructs that allow us to use the
technology of the
day to maintain the spirit – not the spirit of the past, but the spirit
that
has invigorated the PCP community for more than half a century now and
continues
to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|
|
Anastasi,
A. (1958). Differential Psychology. 3rd
ed. (1st ed. 1937). New York: Macmillan.
Bannister,
D., Fransella, F. (1977). Inquiring Man. 2nd ed. (1st
ed. 1971). Harmondsworth: Penguin
Bannister,
D., Fransella, F. (1981). Der
Mensch als Forscher (Inquiring Man). Münster: Aschendorff
Fransella,
F. (Ed.) (200 ). International Handbook
of Personal Construct Psychology. London: Wiley.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hall, C. S.,
Lindzey, G. (1957). Theories of
Personality. New York: Wiley.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The
Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton
Kelly, G. A. (1986). Die
Psychologie der Persönlichen Konstrukte. Paderborn: Junfermann.
Kretch, D.,
Crutchfield, R. S. (1958). Elements of Psychology. New
York: Knopf.
Kretch, D.,
Crutchfield, R. S., Ballachey, E. L. (1962). The
Individual in Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scheer, J.
W. (1996). ‘Congress Language’, Personal Constructs, and Constructive
Internationalism.
In B. M. Walker, J. Costigan, L. L. Viney, B. Warren (Eds.) Personal
Construct Theory. A Psychology for
the Future. Melbourne: APS Imprint. (129-149)
Scheer, J.
W. (Ed.) (2002). Crossing Borders – Going
Places. Personal Constructions of Otherness. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
Scheer, J.
W., Sewell, K. W. (Eds.) (2006). Creative
Construing. Personal Constructions in the Arts. Giessen:
Psychosozial-Verlag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET SITES
|
|
|
The Internet PCP
Portal: http://www.personal-construct.net
The Internet
Encyclopaedia of PCP: http://www.pcp-net.org/encyclopaedia
The e-
journal Personal Construct Theory &
Practice: http://www.pcp-net.org/journal |
|
|
|
|
|
The article is based
on a talk given at the conference on “PCP: a story” organised by
the Centre for Personal Construct at the University of Hertfordshire, UK,
on September 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
ABOUT THE
AUTHOR
Jörn Scheer,
PhD, is Emeritus Professor of Medical
Psychology at the University of Giessen, Germany. He has published
extensively
in the fields of psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy, medical and
health
psychology, and of course in personal construct psychology. He now
lives in his
home town of Hamburg and devotes much of his time to promoting
personal construct psychology, mainly through the Internet. He
co-edited the
first introduction to the repertory grid technique in German and is
co-editor
of the e-journal Personal Construct
Theory & Practice and the Internet
Encyclopaedia of Personal Construct Psychology. His latest edited
books
dealt with cross-cultural aspects of PCP and with PCP and the arts.
E-mail: joern.scheer@joern-scheer.de
|
|
|
click on photo
to
enlarge
|
|
|
REFERENCE
Scheer,
J.
W. (2007). Promoting World Wide Wisdom: Personal construct psychology
and the internet. Personal
Construct Theory & Practice, 4, 63-67.
(Retrieved
from http://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp07/scheer07.html)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Received: 5 October 2006 – Accepted: 10 October 2006 –
Published: 31 January 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|