|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCLOSING CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ASSAULT IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS:
THE MEANINGS AND EMOTIONS WOMEN ASSOCIATE WITH THEIR
EXPERIENCES AND THEIR LIVES NOW
|
|
|
Hilary A.
Maitland and Linda L. Viney |
|
|
School
of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
The meanings and emotions women associate with
disclosing childhood sexual assault within close relationships and their
current lives, were explored, using a personal construct model proposing
disclosure impacts on meaning making, willingness to tell, and relationships.
Twenty three women accessing support services, provided narratives about their
current life and disclosure, completed a disclosure questionnaire, the Social
Support Questionnaire (Sarason, Levine, Basham and Sarason, 1983) and eight
women (a Support Group) discussed their disclosures. Women’s recollections
contained meanings about self, others, relationships, childhood sexual assault,
invalidation, validation, reconstruction, and negative and positive emotions
and the importance of listeners’ reactions to disclosure.
Keywords: Women, childhood
sexual assault, disclosure, recollections. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Erbes (2004) urges to maintain an open mind about the long term
consequences of childhood sexual assault, cautioning against stances that either
minimise the impacts reported by survivors, or those that view these
consequences as inevitable and leading to longstanding damage that cannot be
repaired. When investigating the impact of childhood sexual assault the impact
of what happens when children and adults disclose their childhood assault is
important. It is difficult to “separate whether children’s functioning is
related to abuse experiences, the manner in which abuse is disclosed, or the
manner in which others reacted to the disclosure” (Nagel, Putman, Noll &
Trickett, 1997, p. 138).
The
psychology of personal constructs (see Kelly, 1955/1991) provides a respectful
and hopeful framework in which to explore the experiences of women assaulted as
children, and who had chosen to tell of their experiences to people with whom
they were in close relationships. This approach is respectful since, while
recognizing the shared nature of experiences and meanings people bring to
experiences, it also recognizes the importance of individual women’s experiences
and their views of themselves and their worlds. It is also hopeful since its
basic assumption, constructive alternativism (see Kelly, 1955/1991), is a
source of optimism. It recognises that there is no limit to the way in which
people can make sense of experiences. There is always another way of looking at
events that may open up options for healthier living (Kelly, 1955/1991).
The
research was conducted within a qualitative framework, which fits well with a
personal construct framework. In this research we accepted women’s accounts of
their disclosure experiences, to be their recollections at the time they shared
them with us, of what they believed happened when they disclosed. Personal
construct psychology proposes that it is how people make sense of experiences,
rather than the experiences alone, that influences how they view self, others
and self in relation to others. The psychology of personal constructs also
suggests that these meanings will change over time as people continue to try to
make sense of their lives.
We developed a model of the disclosure processes for women within which
to explore their experiences. Our model stressed the relational nature of
disclosure and the importance of the meanings both the discloser and the
listener bring to these situations.
Our model
proposes that both women disclosing and their listeners bring their own ways of
making sense of their world with them to disclosure experiences while at the
same time endeavoring to understand the meanings the other gives to experiences.
Disclosure provides opportunity for invalidation and validation of meanings
about self, others, self in relation to others and childhood sexual assault for
both women disclosing and their listeners.
This
invalidation and validation will influence women’s personal meanings about
self, others, self in relation to others (Leitner, 1985; Leitner, 1988; Faidley
& Leitner,1993; Leitner & Faidley, 1995) and childhood sexual assault.
These personal meanings will lead to further anticipations about self and self
in relation to others resulting in a variety of emotions .The particular
emotions of women disclosing will be associated with different activity within
their meaning making systems and the meanings and anticipations to which these
give rise (see Kelly 1955/1991; McCoy, 1977; Miall, 1989). Emotions will be
unique for each disclosure experience and for each woman. Each disclosure
experience will influence the likelihood of future disclosure and will impact
on women’s current meanings about childhood sexual assault, self, others and
self in relation to others (relationships).
Figure 1
illustrates our model. It demonstrates the circular nature of the disclosure
experience for the discloser and the listener.
Figure 1: A personal construct model of the processes involved in women's disclosure of childhood sexual assault
The questions that followed from our aim to
explore women’s experiences included:
1. | What meanings about self, others, self in relation to others,
childhood sexual assault and disclosure occur in women’s recollections of
disclosing childhood sexual assault and their descriptions of their current
life experiences?
| 2. | Is there evidence of invalidation and validation of women’s meanings
around self, others, self in relation to others and childhood sexual assault in
their recollections of disclosure experiences and in their descriptions of
their current life experiences?
| 3. | Is there evidence of reconstruction in women’s recollections of their
disclosure experiences and in their descriptions of their current life
experiences?
| 4. | What emotions can be identified in women’s recollections of
disclosing childhood sexual assault and in their descriptions of their current
life experiences?
| 5. | How do women view the impact of their disclosure experiences on their
close relationships? | 6. | Is there a relationship between women’s meanings about their
relationships and the emotions they experience?
|
METHOD
Sampling
Participants were twenty-eight (28) women for whom disclosure
processes were still relevant, as evidenced by their continuing access to
counselling support services. The selection of participants for this research
was ‘purposive’ in that they were seen as being able to provide rich data about
the disclosure of childhood sexual assault in close relationships, something
that we believed would be both useful and relevant to psychotherapists working
with these women and others like them in the health service setting (see
Polkinghorne, 2005; Morrow, 2005; Gerhard, Ratliff
& Lyle, 2001).
Forty eight percent (48%) of women were aged between 20 and 35 years
while fifty two percent (52%) were aged between 41 and 60 years. The women had
been sexually assaulted prior to the age of 14 years by a person with whom they
were in a close relationship (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Percentage of women abused as children by relationship to abuser
Thirty five percent (35%) of the women had
been assaulted by one person while sixty five percent (65%) had been assaulted
as a child by more than one person. The majority of perpetrators were male. The
greatest percent of women (79%) were first assaulted between the ages of 3 and
8 years, nine percent (9%) were first assaulted under 2 years and thirteen
percent (13%) between the ages of 9 and 14 years. Nine percent (9%) of
participants had been assaulted more than once while ninety one percent (91%)
were assaulted over an extended period of time. Sixty one percent (61%) had
also been sexually assaulted as adults.
The majority of women (31%) disclosed to their
mothers. Women also disclosed to counsellors (19%), sisters (8%), fathers (4%)
and friends (8%). Thirty one percent (31%) had disclosed to others but did not
say to whom.
Procedure
Women who were attending three different
services for survivors of childhood sexual assault were invited to participate
in the research. Twenty three women participated individually by providing
information about themselves and their experiences in written form. They were
provided packages containing a sexual assault/disclosure questionnaire which
gathered demographic information and information about their assault
experiences. Paper on which to record an account about the their life as they
viewed it at the time of the research and paper on which to record an account
about an important past disclosure experience was supplied (based on the method
developed by Gottschalk & Gleser,1969, Viney & Caputi, 2005) and the
Social Support Questionnaire-SSQ (Sarason, Levine, Basham & Sarason, 1983).
The Social
Support Questionnaire was included as one measure of participant’s meanings
about their relationships. The Social Support Questionnaire consists of
twenty-seven (27) questions designed to provide information on the extent of
people’s social support and the level of satisfaction they perceive in relation
to the support they receive from others. These questions ask the person
completing the questionnaire to list those people:
- They could turn to or count on in a
variety of different situations;
- To whom they thought they were
important;
- They could talk to frankly;
- Who helped them feel positive;
- Who accepted them totally;
- With whom they could totally be
themselves.
People
complete the questionnaire by writing down the names of people for each
question or circling the “no one” response. In addition, they indicate how
satisfied they are with this level of support on a 6-point scale from “Very
Satisfied” to “Very Dissatisfied”.
Sarason
Levine, Basham and Sarason (1983) and Heitzmann and Kaplan (1988) present
research findings establishing the reliability and validity of the SSQ (test
retest reliability of .90 for SSQN (measuring the number of people in an
individual’s support network) and .83 for SSQS (measuring the individuals
satisfaction with their social support); internal consistency of .97 for SSQN
and .94 for SSQS; and appropriate correlations with other measures).
Eight women
also participated in a support group discussion morning. This provided
opportunity to explore women’s initial disclosure experiences in more depth
using a number of structured questions developed in collaboration with the
Group facilitator.
DATA ANALYSIS
The
meanings, emotions and relationships in individual women’s accounts of their
experiences (narratives) were explored using thematic analysis. Using the methods
outlined by Miles and Huberman (1994) two people independently read all
transcripts to identify meanings using meaning codes. These codes were
initially developed based on a review of the literature in relation to
childhood sexual assault and disclosure and clinical experience with survivors
of childhood sexual assault. Both raters followed a set of instructions
detailing the process of coding. The inter- rater agreement for these ratings
was 0.77 (calculated using the formula: agreements divided by (agreements plus
disagreements) as recommended by Boyatzis (1998) which was considered
acceptable (see Miles & Huberman ,1994; and Boyatzis 1998).
These meanings were
then explored further by grouping them to enable the clustering of meanings and
across case comparisons presented as data displays (see Miles & Huberman,
1994; Boyatzis, 1998). The following questions guided this process:
- What
does the transcript say about self?
- What
does the transcript say about disclosure?
- What
does the transcript say about abuse?
- What
does the transcript say about life now? (Life Now transcripts only)
- What
does the transcript say about the woman’s emotions?
- What
does the transcript say about others?
- What
does the transcript say about the woman’s relationships?
The Support
Group transcript was explored for meanings using the established meaning codes
used for the individual narratives. Narratives were also analysed on a word by
word basis (Pennebaker, Francis & Booth, 2001, 1997) using the Linguistic
Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2001) software.
The LIWC
2001 was developed “to provide an efficient and effective method for studying
the various emotional, cognitive, structural and process components present in
individuals’ verbal and written speech samples” (Pennebaker, Francis &
Booth, 2001, p.12). The selection of words used to define the LIWC2001
categories occurred over a number of years and involved the compilation of
broad word lists that were further refined in 1992-1994 and again in 1997.
Support for the reliability and validity for the LIWC 2001 was established by
comparing LIWC scales and judges ratings for the same categories and are
presented in the manual. The LIWC 2001 is inherently reliable since it will
score the same transcript the same way every time.
Content analysis
of narratives using well-established content analysis scales to assess emotions
and relationships (Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969; Westbrook, 1976; Viney &
Westbrook, 1979; Viney & Caputi, 2005) was undertaken using the PCAD 2000
(Psychiatric Content Analysis and Diagnosis 2000) for the content analysis of
the Anxiety (Threat) Scale, Hostility Directed Outward Scale, Hostility
Directed Inward Scale, Ambivalent Hostility Scale, Depression Scale, Hope
Scale, and Human Relations Scale and a computer assisted scoring program,
Analyse (see Viney, Caputi & Webster, 2000) to score the Positive Affect
and Sociality Scales.
The
Anxiety Scale measures “death, mutilation, separation, guilt, shame, and
diffuse or nonspecific anxiety” (Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969, p. 22). The
Hostility Scales were designed to measure “the anger portion of the hostility
concept” (Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969, p. 31) and focus on the direction of
the hostility, that is, hostility directed away from the self (Hostility
Outward Scale) including “adversely critical, angry, assaultive, asocial
impulses and drives toward objects outside oneself ” (Gottschalk & Gleser,
1969, p. 32), hostility directed toward the self (Hostility Inward Scale)
including “self hate and self criticism and, to some extent, feelings of
anxious depression and masochism”( Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969, p. 32) and
ambivalently directed hostility (Ambivalent Hostility Scale) “suggesting
destructive and critical thoughts or actions of others to the self” (Gottschalk
& Gleser, 1969, p. 32) but also including some aspects of inward and
outward directed hostility.
The Human Relations
Scale is designed to measure “an individual’s degree of interest in and his
capacity for constructive, mutually productive, or satisfying human relationships”
(Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969, p. 220) which is relevant to the study of close
relationships. The Hope Scale is designed to measure “the intensity of the
optimism that a favourable outcome was likely to occur, not only in one’s
personal earthly activities, but also in cosmic phenomena and even in spiritual
or imaginary events” (Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969, p. 247). .
Gottschalk &
Gleser (1969) report a number of studies examining the validity of the Anxiety
Scale (comparing the Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety scale to other measures
including clinical psychiatric interviews, self report measures, adjective
checklists, clinical ratings of Thematic Apperception stories,
psychotherapeutic interviews, psychobiological and psychobiochemical studies).
The Hostility Scale scores have been examined in studies designed to compare
the three types of hostility with other measures of hostility including
adjective checklists, ratings on psychiatric rating scales, psychiatric
evaluation of hostility, psychotherapeutic interviews, Thematic Apperception
stories, psycho-physiological studies, psychopharmacological studies, and
psycho-biochemical studies (Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969).
The scales
included in the final development of the computerised version, PCAD 2000 (GB
Software, Gottschalk & Bechtel, 2002) are an extension of the original
scales developed by Gottschalk and Gleser (1969). The Depression Scale designed
to measure the construct of depression (which includes hopelessness,
self-accusation, psychomotor retardation, somatic concerns and death and
mutilation depression) is relevant to the study of emotions around the
disclosure of childhood sexual assault.
The
development of computerised scoring for content analysis scales has been
undertaken over a considerable period of time beginning in 1975 with the latest
version of the PCAD 2000 released in 2003. The PCAD 2000 is able to “do a
reliable job of scoring the Gottschalk-Gleser Anxiety and Hostility scales, but
it also derives scores on the Social Alienation Disorganisation, Cognitive
Impairment, Depression, and Hope Scales.” (GB Software, Gottschalk &
Bechtel, 2002, p. 41). Inter-scorer reliability between human raters and an
earlier version of the PCAD 2000 for the Anxiety and Hostility Scales was 0.80
and above.
The
Positive Affect Scale (Westbrook, 1976) is designed to assess positive feeling
states “that are usually considered pleasurable, agreeable or desirable as
opposed to negative affects that are considered unpleasant” (Westbrook, 1976,
p. 716). Normative data for five groups was provided in the development of the scale.
The Positive Affect scale will be used as one measure of positive emotions in
this research.
The
Sociality Scales (Viney & Westbrook, 1979) are designed to “assess the
extent to which a person is currently experiencing satisfying interpersonal
relationships” (Viney & Westbrook, 1979, p. 129). The Sociality Scale has
been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool for tapping people’s positive
interpersonal relationships (Viney & Westbrook, 1979). This Scale along
with the Human Relations Scale and the SSQ will be used to measure women’s
interpersonal relationships.
Viney,
Caputi and Webster (2000) and Viney and Caputi (2005) reviewing the Positive
Affect Scale present an overview of studies demonstrating satisfactory inter
rater reliability and validity. Viney and Caputi (2005, p. 121) indicate
validity is demonstrated by the fact that the Positive Affect Scale scores “are
independent of gender, age, and occupational status but are related to scores
on other positively toned measures…and negatively related to scores on
negatively toned measures.”
Viney,
Caputi and Webster (2000) reviewing the Sociality Scales present an overview of
studies demonstrating satisfactory inter rater reliability, internal
consistency, stability, and validity (e.g., independent of gender, age and
occupational status, scores are related negatively to scores of negatively
toned states, and they are able to discriminate between groups of people as
anticipated).
Viney, Caputi and Webster
(2000) outline a computerised scoring system “Analyse” that enables computer
assisted scoring for a number of scales including the Positive Affect Scale and
the Sociality Scales. As with the PCAD 2000 this program helps overcome some of
the difficulties encountered when attempting to score the content analysis
scales manually and ensure good inter rater reliability.
RESULTS
Meanings about
disclosure and life now
Meanings about self
Meanings
about being accepted/not being accepted, being different from/similar to
others, feeing loved/not loved, experiencing pain/no pain, seeing themselves as
valuable/not valuable and whole/not whole were present in women’s narratives of
disclosure and life now. A higher percentage of women included meanings about
being accepted/not accepted than other meanings about self in disclosure
narratives, while being accepted/not accepted and feeling loved/not loved were
the most prominent meanings identified in women’s life now narratives.
Meanings about self in
relation to others
Meanings
about control/lack of control in relationships, family/lack of family,
friends/lack of friends, intimacy/lack of intimacy in relationships, being
isolated/not isolated, love/lack of love in relationships, open/not open in relationships,
feeling safe/not safe in relationships, having support/lack of support in
relationships, and trust/lack of trust in relationships were identified in
women’s narratives of disclosure and life now. Meanings about family/lack of
family and support/lack of support in relationships were the most prominent in
women’s disclosure narratives. Meanings about family, friends and intimacy were
most prominent in women’s life now narratives. Between forty percent (40%) and
fifty percent (50%) of women identified meanings around trust as important for
them in both their disclosure and life now narratives.
Exploring
support further indicated that the majority of women relied most on the support
from professionals. Approximately half of the women were attending counselling
and specialist support groups, however, support from family (26%) and friends
(17%) was also important to them.
Exploring
meanings around self in relation to others in the Support Group, indicated that
women received a mixture of reactions from their listeners, with some receiving
support and feeling understood while others indicating their listeners did not
offer support or understand how they were feeling at the time. From the Support
Group it was evident that the relationships with the person to whom women
initially disclosed changed following disclosure. The changes included
increased intimacy, when their listener was able to understand them better, or
reduced intimacy, when their listener’s were not able to accept the women’s
story with the latter, negative reaction, being most common. The Support Group
also illustrated the importance of disclosure on women’s willingness to trust
others with whom they were in close relationships. A mixture of reactions was
apparent. Some women indicated they were reluctant to trust, others indicated
they had changed the way they trusted and who they trusted since disclosure,
while others indicated they were comfortable with trusting others.
Meanings about assault
Meanings about being betrayed/not betrayed, blamed/not blamed, denying
the assault/not denying the assault, the assault being secret/not secret, and
listener’s wanting to know/not want to know about the assault were present in
women’s narratives of disclosure. Meanings about betrayal were absent from
women’s life now narratives. Meanings about assault were less prominent in
women’s narratives for life now than they were for disclosure. This indicates
that when talking about their life in the present, women’s childhood sexual
assault was not a central feature for them, although its impact may be seen in
their narratives.
Meanings about disclosure
Meanings
about being believed/not believed, being heard/not being heard, telling/not
telling others, and feeling they were understood/not understood were present in
women’s narratives of disclosure and life now. All these meanings, apart from
feeling they were or were not understood, were much less prominent in women’s
life now narratives. This indicates that when women disclose personal details
about themselves, either at disclosure or as part of their everyday
experiences, the reactions of their listeners’ is important to them,
especially, being believed, heard and understood. Unfortunately many women in
this research were not met with belief and support.
Exploring meanings about being believed further revealed that over 70%
of women indicated they were believed at the time of disclosure, of those women
who were believed one third were either blamed for the sexual assault or their
listener took no action to help them following disclosure. Also, of those women
who indicated they were believed by their listeners, almost half were
encouraged to keep it secret. One third of the women who were believed by their
listeners indicated their listeners did not want to know details about the
assault or to talk about it following the disclosure.
The Support Group further illustrated the impact of listener’s reactions
on women’s willingness to share their stories of assault with others. A mixture
of responses were reported by women, with some women (especially those who had
received unhelpful responses) indicating reluctance to share with others, some
were very careful about who they were willing to tell, while others indicated
that withholding disclosure from people with whom they were in very close
relationships was counter productive, viewing telling as essential for intimate
relationships.
Meanings about recovery
Meanings about the importance of counselling and about recovery/lack of
recovery were present in women’s narratives about disclosure and life now. Both
were more prominent in women’s life now narratives than they were in their
narratives about disclosure. Almost ninety percent (90%) of women made
reference to recovery in their life now narratives.
Meanings about the quality women associated
with their lives
Meanings
about change were more prominent in women’s disclosure narratives than life now
narratives. Meanings about having a future/no future, life being ok/not ok,
turmoil/stability, and having hope/no hope were more prominent in women’s life
now narratives than in their disclosure narratives. Satisfaction with their
lives in the present was important for women, with many of them indicating that
their lives lacked the things they really wanted to be truly satisfied,
especially intimacy in their relationships.
Invalidation, validation and re-construction
Invalidation,
validation and re-construction were explored by looking at women’s
anticipations about how their listener’s would react, how they reacted and how
they felt about those reactions and their narratives. This was done by
examining women’s narratives and by their answers to question 13 of the sexual
assault/disclosure questionnaire were examined. Question 13 asked, “Before you
told this person how did you expect they would respond?"
Thirteen
percent (13%) of women had no prior anticipations, twenty two percent (22%) had
anticipations that their listener’s reactions would be non-supportive, thirty
five percent (35%) anticipated their listener’s reactions would be supportive,
twenty six percent (26%) anticipated both non-supportive and supportive
reactions from their listeners and four percent (4%) of women’s anticipations
were unknown. Figure 3 indicates the extent to which these anticipations were
validated.
Figure 3: Women's
anticipations about listener's reactions prior to disclosure that were
invalidated, validated or neither invalidated or validated
These results
indicate that listener’s reactions invalidated, validated or provided neither
invalidation or validation for women’s anticipations regardless of whether
women expected support or no support. Women’s narratives also provided evidence
for invalidation and validation (for example, when listers did not believe or
believed what women told them respectively).
Figure 4: Changes in how women felt about listener's reactions to their disclosure
Looking at the emotions women associated with their listener’s reactions
to disclosure in Figure 4 indicates that there had been some changes to how
they felt about their listeners’ reactions in the present from how they had
felt at the time of disclosure. These changes provide evidence that the
meanings women had given to these had changed over time (evidence of
re-construction). Women’s narratives also included statements to suggest that
how they viewed their disclosure experience had changed over time (e.g., “I am starting to look at incest from
another side”, “I feel now that I trusted too quickly”)
Emotions associated with women’s disclosure and
life now
Negative
and positive emotions were evident in women’s narratives of disclosure and life
now, namely, anger, hostility, anxiety, fear, mixed emotions, guilt, shame,
sadness/depression, love, pleasant emotions in general, and relief. Hostility
and relief were identified only in women’s narratives of disclosure, while love
was identified only in women’s narratives of life now. A higher percentage of
women reported anger, anxiety, guilt, sadness/depression and positive emotions
in their life now narratives than disclosure narratives.
Content
analysis scales showed evidence of threat, guilt, shame, hostility, depression,
positive affect and hope with depression being the most prominent affect in
both disclosure and life now narratives (see Figure 5).
Figure 5: Means and standard deviations for content analysis scales measuring the effect in women's narratives
There were
particular meanings that could be identified in women’s narratives associated
with the emotions they experienced. In narratives about disclosure, fear was
associated with the childhood sexual assault, while anger was associated with
not being believed. Shame was associated with talking about the child sexual
assault and not being believed. Sadness was associated with recalling the child
sexual assault, seeing its impact on loved ones, their children’s abuse, and
turmoil in their lives. Relief was associated with being able to tell their
stories and being heard. Pleasant emotions were associated with the burden
being lifted by telling and being told the abuse would stop.
In
narratives about life now, threat was associated with actual threats to women’s
physical safety. Anxiety was associated with the unknown potential impact of
women’s abuse on others, and fear with recalling the childhood sexual assault
and everyday things. Anger was associated with being rejected by others, lack
of supports and the child sexual assault. Shame was associated with how they
thought about others. Sadness was associated with not being believed when they
shared the childhood sexual assault, problems in relationships (especially lack
of intimacy and support), confusion and struggling to survive daily. Pleasant
emotions were associated with loving and supportive relationships.
It was
anticipated there would be an association between the emotions women
experienced and their social networks, in particular their experience of
satisfying close relationships. Pearson product moment correlations between
negative affects and the four measures of relationships (SSQN, SSQS, Sociality
Scale and Human Relations Scale) failed to reach significance. Pearson product
moment correlation coefficients for positive affects and each of the measures
of relationships are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Correlation coefficients for positive emotions and relationship measures
| Human
Relations | Sociality | SSQN | SSQS | Positive affect | 0.804
(p<.05) | 0.863
(p<.01) | 0.410
(p>.05) | 0.568
(p<.05) | Hope | 0.746
(p< .01) | 0.727
(p<.05) | 0.350
(p>.05) | 0.543
(p<.05) |
Multiple regression analyses designed to investigate these relationships
further indicated that scores on the Sociality Scale predicted scores on both
the Hope and Positive Affect Scales (F=9.913,p<0.001;F=10.169, p<0.001
respectively). These results indicated there was a positive relationship
between positive emotions and positive social networks.
DISCUSSION
These
findings have important implications for women when looked at in conjunction
with previous findings about disclosure showing that the need to continue
talking about traumatic events will be there for as long as the memory of the
event produces emotions (Rime, Finkenauer, Luminet, Zech & Philippot, 1998)
and that sharing intense emotions is one way in which people can obtain the
help and support they need from others (Pennebaker, Zech & Rime, 2001).
Women in this study indicated that disclosure did not always provide them with
the help and support they needed and that often the person to whom they
disclosed did not want to continue talking about it following disclosure.
Although
previous findings highlight that the choice of person to whom women disclose is
important (Pennebaker, 1990), the experience of women in this research
indicates that women did not always select listeners who they anticipated to be
supportive. Many women chose to disclose even though they anticipated negative
reactions from their listeners, while others who selected listeners they
anticipated to react supportively, were disappointed in their listener’s
reactions.
Women in this research were clear that the disclosure of childhood
sexual assault changed the nature of their relationship with their listeners.
Many of them viewed many of the difficulties they experienced in their daily
lives as attributable to their past assault and the reactions they received at
disclosure.
The
findings in relation to life quality are similar to earlier research that
suggests women sexually assaulted as children may experience a lower level of
life satisfaction (Fassler, Amodeo,
Griffin, Clay, & Ellis, 2005). When looking at emotions, earlier
studies (Lusk & Waterman, 1986; Lamb, 1986; Langtree, Briere & Zaide,
1991;Ystgaard, Hestetun, Loeb & Mehlum, 2004; and Fassler, Amodeo, Griffin, Clay, & Ellis, 2005) found similar negative emotions in women who had been sexually
assaulted as children to those identified in this research.
Our model emphasizes
the importance of women’s close relationships, their meanings around self, self
in relation to others and the childhood sexual assault. The meanings identified
in women’s narratives of disclosure, their responses to questions about the
anticipations they had about their listener’s reactions prior to disclosing,
and responses of women to the questions discussed in the Support Group, provide
support for our model. Women disclosing came to the disclosure experience with
existing meanings or ways of making sense of self and others (e.g., meanings
about being able to trust their listener, of receiving support or that they may
not be believed). There was evidence that listeners also brought their own
meanings to the disclosure experience, especially about the discloser and their
responsibility for the sexual assault (e.g., comments, such as, “are you sure
you did not come onto him” suggesting that the woman may have encouraged the
assault, or seeing it as “exploration”).
Women disclosing were
willing to tell (e.g., wanted help following the assault, wanted to know what
their listener knew about what was happening in the home). Disclosure involved
a conversation around the childhood sexual assault involving attempts to
understand each others’ meanings (e.g., “are you telling me your father was
sexually assaulting you?”; “Do you believe him?”). Women received invalidation
and validation of their existing meanings about self, others, self in relation
to others, the childhood sexual assault (e.g., references to their
listener not believing what they said or denying the abuse occurred, which
invalidates the woman’s story and at the same time invalidates her as a
construer of her life story). Listener’s reactions usually took the form of
comments, although sometimes, it was what they did after the disclosure that
provided invalidation and validation. Women gave meanings to their disclosure
experiences, women made anticipations about future events based on these
meanings (e.g., in relation to trusting others, being able to tell others to
whom they were close, about the ongoing nature of their relationships with
their listener) which affected how they behaved, their relationships after
disclosure and consequently their emotions.
There was
also support for our model’s prediction that disclosure would have an impact on
the relationship between discloser and listener and other close relationships.
Women described changes to their relationships with their listeners following
disclosure and women describe being cautious about other existing and
subsequent close relationships following disclosure, especially in relation to
intimacy, trust and openness, which indicates that disclosure impacts on
women’s close relationships in general.
The findings of this study indicate that four issues were very important
for women at the time of disclosure, namely, that those with whom they have
close relationships:
- believe
their story of abuse and see them as innocent of any responsibility for the
childhood sexual assault ;
- demonstrate
their support by their actions;
- be
willing to listen and talk about the past assault; and,
- attempt
to understand the childhood sexual assault from the survivor’s perspective,
rather than imposing their own meanings on it.
The importance women placed on being believed when they disclosed and
the varying degree to which listeners were able to do so, suggests that,
although in it’s existing form, our model provides an understanding of the
processes of the disclosure of childhood sexual assault, it could be refined to
highlight this aspect of listener characteristics. In order to believe what
they are being told listener’s need an ability and willingness to be credulous
listeners ( Kelly, 1955/1991) at the time of disclosure.
As credulous listeners, there is a requirement that they suspend their
own meanings in order to accommodate the meanings provided by the discloser,
even if they are discrepant from their own. Figure 6 presents a revised version
of our model which acknowledges this important aspect of listener characteristics.
Figure 6: Revised personal construct model of the processes involved in women's disclosure of childhood sexual assault
Being
credulous listeners poses challenges for everyone. People develop their own
individual meanings to make sense of their experiences. How do we avoid
imposing our own meanings on other people’s experiences rather than
understanding theirs? Kelly’s Sociality Corollary acknowledges the importance
of being able to construe “the construction processes of another” (Kelly,
1955/1991, p.66) in social relationships. This does not mean that to have a
relationship with someone people need to share common constructs, although on
occasions they may (Kelly’s Commonality Corollary), but rather they need to be
able to make the effort to see things through other people’s eyes (how they
construe things). Being able to do this enables us to interact respectfully
with others. Interacting in this way will help listeners avoid the difficulties
that arise when they impose their own meanings on other’s experiences.
The
importance of the listener believing, showing this by supportive actions,
willingness to listen and attempting to understand the discloser’s experience
from their points of view remained important when women were describing their
lives now. In addition to these issues, for life now, women also focused on the
importance of intimacy in their close relationships, talking about the distress
they felt over lack of intimacy, the struggle they had developing intimate
relationships, or the positive impact of intimacy in close relationships. In
fact, positive emotions and hope were associated with satisfying close
relationships for life now.
The four issues that women identified as
important when disclosing to someone with whom they had a close relationship,
are relevant for clinical practice. Counselling or psychotherapy is designed to
provide a safe environment in which a close relationship will develop between
the therapist/counsellor and his or her client. It is, therefore, very
important that those working in clinical roles with women who have experienced
childhood sexual assault, come to the therapeutic relationship in a manner that
will both respect these women’s experiences and enable them to re-construe
these so they can begin to live in the present in a way that will promote
greater wholeness and health. Kelly (1955/1991, p. 121) drew attention to the
importance of the therapist “taking what he sees and hears at face value [of
taking] the credulous attitude”.
The four issues that were important for women at the time of disclosure
that impact on clinical practice, are also relevant to the wider community. It
highlights the need for communities to recognize the importance for educating
the general community about childhood abuse, especially sexual assault and for
intensive support and education, for the families, especially non abusive
parents and carers, of women sexually assaulted as children. The process of
re-construction necessary for healing cannot occur in isolation. Other family
members may also need to re-evaluate their meanings around the sexual assault
and the woman who was assaulted.
Future
research designed to test the model and the usefulness of the qualitative
methods employed in this research, with a greater variety of participants
including non –clinical samples, and including understanding disclosure from
the listener’s perspective would be appropriate.
In summary,
this research demonstrated the usefulness of our personal construct model of
disclosure and a qualitative approach, focusing on detailed exploration of
individual experiences, when trying to better understand women’s experiences of
the disclosure of childhood sexual assault.
| |
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|
| Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information.
Thematic analysis and code development. London, England: Sage Publications.
Erbes, C. R. (2004). Our constructions of trauma: a dialectical
perspective. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 201-220.
Faidley, A., & Leitner, L. (1993). Assessing experience in psychotherapy. Personal construct alternatives. Westport,
CT: Praeger.
Fassler, I., Amodeo, M., Griffin, M., Clay, C., & Ellis, M. (2005). Predicting long-term outcomes for women sexually
abused in childhood: contribution of abuse severity verses family environment.
Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 269-284.
Gerhard,D. R., Ratliff, D. A., & Lyle, R. R. (2001). Qualitative research in family therapy: a substantive
and methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27,
261-274.
Gottschalk. L. A., & Bechtel, R.J. (2002).
PCAD 2000: Computerized psychiatric
content analysis and diagnosis. Program and manual. California:
GB Software.
Gottschalk, L.A. & Gleser, G. G.
(1969). The measurement of psychological states through the
content analysis of verbal behaviour. Berkely: University of California Press.
Kelly, G. A. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal constructs.
Volume one. A theory of personality (2nd edition). London:
Routledge.
Kelly, G.A. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal contructs.
Volume two. Clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy (2nd Edition). New
York:
Routlledge.
Lamb, S. (1986). Treating sexually abused children:issues of
blame and responsibility. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56,
303-307.
Langtree, C., Briere, J., & Zaide, L.
(1991). Incidence and impact of sexual abuse in a childhood
outpatient sample: the role of direct inquiry. Child Abuse and Neglect,
15, 447-453.
Leitner, L.M. (1985). The terrors of cognition: on the
experiential validity of personal; construct theory. In Bannister, D (Ed). Issues
and approaches in personal construct theory. (pp. 83-103). New York, NY:
Academic Press.
Leitner, L.M. (1988). Terror, risk, and reverence: experienctial
personal construct psychotherapy. International Journal of Personal
Construct Psychology, 1, 251-261.
Leitner, L. M., & Faidley, A.
J. (1995). The awful, awful nature of ROLE
relationships. In Neimeyer, R. A., and Neimeyer, G. J. (Eds). Advances in
personal construct psychology. (pp.
291-314). London: JAI Press Inc.
Lusk, R., & Waterman, J. (1986). Effects of sexual
abuse on children. In MacFarlane, K., and Waterman, J. (Eds) Sexual abuse of
young children. (pp. 101-118) New
York, NY: Guilford Press.
McCoy, M. M. (1977). A reconstruction of emotion. In Bannister,
D (Ed). New perspectives in personal construct theory. (pp. 93-124). New
York, NY: Academic Press.
Miall,D. S. (1989). Anticipating the self: toward a personal
construct model of emotion. International Journal of Personal Construct
Psychology, 2, 185-198.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcbook. Qualitative data
analysis. 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications.
Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative
research in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology,
52, 250-260.
Nagel, D.E., Putman, F.W., Noll, J.G., & Trickett, P.K. (1997). Disclosure patterns
of sexual abuse and psychological functioning at a 1- year follow up. Child
Abuse and Neglect, 21, 137-147.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1990). Opening up. The healing power of expressing
emotions. New
York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic
inquiry and word count LIWC2001 Manual. Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
Pennebaker, J. W., Zech, E., & Rime, B. (2001). Disclosing and
sharing emotion: Psychological, social, and health consequences. In M. S. Stroebe,
W. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, & H. Schut (Eds.) Handbook of bereavement
research: consequences, coping and care. (pp. 517-539). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in
qualitative research. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52, 137-145.
Rime, B., Finkenauer, C.,
Luminet, O., Zech, E., & Philippot, P. (1998).
Social sharing of emotion: New
evidence and new questions. The European Review of Social Psychology, 9,
145-189.
Sarason, I., Levine, H., Basham, R., & Sarason, B. (1983). Assessing social
support: the Social Support Questionnaire. The Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 44, 127-139.
Viney, L.L., & Caputi, P. (2005). Using the Origin and Pawn, Positive Affect,
CASPM, and Cognitive Anxiety content analysis scales in counselling research. Measurement
and Evaluation in Counselling and Developemnt, 38, 115-126.
Viney, L.L. & Westbrook, M. T. (1979). Sociality: a content analysis scale for
verbalizations. Social Behaviour and Personality, 7, 129-137.
Viney, L. L., Caputi, P., & Webster, D. (2000). Computerised content
analysis scales: their use in personal construct research. Paper presented
at the Australasian Personal Construct Psychology Conference.
Westbrook, M. T. (1976). Positive affect: a method of content
analysis for verbal samples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
44, 715-719.
Ystgaard, M., Hestetun, I., Loeb,
M., & Mehlum, L. (2004). Is there a specific relationship between
childhood sexual and physical abuse and repeated suicidal behaviour? Child
Abuse and Neglect, 28, 863-875.
| |
|
|
|
|
ABOUT THE
AUTHORS
Hilary Maitland, PhD is currently working
as a clinical psychologist with the South East Sydney Illawarra Area Health
Service in New South Wales, Australia.
Hilary works as a counsellor with children and adolescents who have experienced
abuse and neglect trauma. Hilary is a Doctor of Philosophy, Clinical Psychology
and in collaboration with Linda Viney has written and presented papers focusing
on applying personal construct psychology to an understanding of the impact of
trauma on women and children. Email: hilary.maitland@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Linda Viney, PhD is a Professional
Research Fellow in Clinical Psychology at the University of Wollonong,
having directed the Clinical Postgraduate Program for 15 years. Linda has
applied personal construct psychology, and published in the areas of clinical,
counselling and health psychology, with 175 book chapters and articles with an
emphasis on processes and evaluation. Recently she applied this approach,
leading a research project funded by the Australian Research Council with
mental health consumers to evaluate mental health services. Linda is currently
collaborating in a book called Personal Construct Methodology to be published
by Wiley. Linda has also, in collaboration with Deborah Truneckova, developed
models of individual and group supervision using personal construct psychology.
Email: lviney@uow.edu.au
Home Page: http://www.uow.edu.au/health/psyc/staff/UOW024981.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCE
Maitland, H. A., Viney, L. L. (2008).
Disclosing childhood sexual assault in close relationships: The
meanings and emotions women associate with their experiences and their
lives now. Personal
Construct Theory & Practice, 5, 149-164.
(Retrieved from http://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp08/maitland08.html)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Received: 31 October 2007 – Accepted: 12 June 2008 –
Published: 23 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|