|
The
journey to my dissertation began early when I realized that I could not
understand why I was not like other guys. They were sexually attracted to
women; I was not. To find out, I began to read Freud at age 18 at the
suggestion of a dorm counselor in Clinical Psychology. Freud’s distinction
between manifest and latent content made perfect sense, and thus began my
journey to understand the unconscious deeper significances and meanings of my
young life. A quote for Jean Paul Sartre summarizes my search and my dissertation:
“A single gesture implies a Weltanschauung.”
Many people have asked me why I didn’t publish my dissertation. The
answer is simple; I didn’t know how to publish a dissertation! I also didn’t
think the dissertation was important, because I believed I had only
demonstrated the obvious, and it had taken six months of work to do that. What
interested me most was my theoretical extension of Kelly’s work. Kelly said
this had pleased him more than my methodologies. After my extensive review of
the psychological research literature in preparation for my Doctoral exams,
Kelly asked what I now thought of the research literature. I said it was mostly
depressing, generally not worth the paper it was printed on. It was primarily
aimed at tenure and promotion. He smiled and said, “Good! You will probably be
a good psychologist. Well, I guess someone has to do the research.” Kelly was a
theorist, not a researcher. Kelly very much wanted me to accept a position at Harvard, but I
knew I was not up to the pressure of such a place. I opted for what I thought
would be less pressuring for publications and grant money. He was definitely disappointed, but relented and wrote a fine letter
of recommendation to the University of Colorado at Boulder. I had been naïve in
believing that professors were hired to pursue truth and was quickly informed
that grant money was the winning ticket, followed by a large number of
publications and citations.
Before I had entered graduate school, I planned on becoming a
skilled psychotherapist for two reasons: First, I believed I could learn more
of significance and depth about people in the intimate context of therapy. Second,
I feel less lonely the more deeply I understand another. I had been friends
with faculty in the English department and believed that great authors had
understood people better than psychologists, primarily because authors see the
world through the eyes (constructs) of their characters. Kelly often quoted his
first law of learning, “If you don’t understand what a person is doing, ask
him! He just might tell you.” Kelly listened deeply to people and from his
remarkable empathy came Personal Construct Theory. He didn’t do research. He
was my mentor and role model, my good father.
Kelly also wanted to pack the universities with his students, so we
were warned not to mention that we wanted to be therapists or we would be
dropped from the program. I knew that I did not want to be an academic
researcher, because I saw the publish-or-perish game as cynical and I believed
I could learn more of value in the intimacy of therapy, but I reluctantly
agreed to give it a try. Significantly, when my wife and I looked down on the
beautiful campus at Boulder, Colorado on our first day there, a loud voice in
my head astonished me and said, “I don’t want this!” How prophetic. While on
the faculty, I became friends with Prof. Peter Ossorio, founder of Descriptive
Psychology, who was one of the most brilliant people I have ever had the
privilege of knowing. Through him, I developed a strong interest in philosophical
psychology. His work is challenging and brilliant.
It was clear by this time that I was far more interested in ideas
than data, not a good fit for academia. I transferred to Miami University in
Oxford, Ohio in the hope of even less publication pressure, but then I longed
even more for the freedom and intimacy of therapy. Finally, petty academic
politics and the homophobia of the all male faculty was sufficient for me to
make a clean break. I set up a successful independent practice (and tripled my
income) in the beautiful San Francisco Bay area. I have never regretted that
decision. I was fortunate to have a vocation in which I was actively
compassionately related to others. My clients were my very best teachers and I
have deep gratitude for the privilege of knowing them in truth. Theirs were the
beautiful songs of the human soul.
Surprisingly, I had no idea of the usefulness of my dissertation or
what had happened in Construct Theory until Beverly Walker and Fay Fransella
contacted me just several years ago. My work, I was told, had been cited in
over 1,000 research studies and was known internationally! Astonishing! I had
listed many implications for further research in my dissertation and I had also
compiled a private list of 20 really interesting studies that I wanted to
complete before others did.
Sadly, I no longer have that list and can’t remember what was on it.
That was 44 years ago.
One idea that I thought was most important, however, came from my
careful observations about what intrinsic standards clients use to make
decisions. That is, when laddering up their decision matrix, people eventually
came to a standard that is an end in itself, not a means to an end. These standards
are at the highest levels of significance. These are the constructs that modulate
our construing and our very life. They are the Way of Life constructs that
define us as persons. I have identified four such intrinsic standards: 1.
Hedonic; pleasure vs. pain. 2. Prudential; regard for one’s own self interest,
pleasurable or not. 3. Ethical; non-harmfulness, right vs. wrong in moral
conduct. 4. Aesthetics; the standards of fittingness and appropriateness, e.g.
truth, beauty, and goodness.
What is of interest in deeply understanding people is what are the
relative weights in context that an individual gives to these Way of Life
standards? For example, is the person primarily, in a given context, a seeker
of pleasurable feelings, an exploiter, a moralist, an artist, a truth seeker? Most
people make decisions based on how it makes them feel – hedonism, and are, therefore,
subject to the vagaries of emotional conditioning. The third and forth
intrinsic standards have primarily characterized my own life. It is my ardent
hope that someone will investigate the richness of these vital Way of Life intrinsic
standards. I regret that I did not – on those rare occasions in which I indulge
in regrets!
| |